"A constitutional amendment...."
Oct. 24th, 2008 07:50 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
"A constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriages is a form of gay bashing and it would do noting at all to protect traditional marriage" - Corretta Scott King
Anyone have an opposing viewpoint that can be articulated with rational thought?
Anyone have an opposing viewpoint that can be articulated with rational thought?
no subject
Date: 2008-10-25 05:48 pm (UTC)The problem is that the Government got involved in Marriage, as you said. Because of this, there are inequalities that were attached to people who are "married" and those who are not.
If these didn't exist, and marriage was purely between two people as they saw fit, not changing their "status" within the laws, then marriage wouldn't be a Government issue and we wouldn't be dealing with a situation where there are differences depending on that.
Unfortunately, the way the laws are setup, there are major differences between being Married, partners in a Civil Union and being just partners.
The Government has created this, and it is in their best interest to keep it going... FUD and Taxes. =/
no subject
Date: 2008-10-25 11:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-26 01:48 am (UTC)It is one of those things that once they have their foot in it, they don't see the advantage of getting out of it.
I probably should have written it as "..and they feel it is in their best interest to keep it going."
For example, we are still paying "excise tax" on bicycle tires and tubes that was supposed to be abolished a long time ago... it is hidden at the distributor level, but it still exists, as it is seen as bringing in money, and those on the inside want to keep it that way... and yes, we are being taxed (sales tax) on a tax (excise tax.)
My point is that in many things Government have gotten so involved that they can't bring themselves together to get out of it.