Date: 2008-10-25 08:59 am (UTC)
I have an opposing viewpoint that is very rational. I do not believe in State marriage laws. IMHO marriage is a covenant between two people which is personal and unalienable, and the government has zero business being involved with that in ANY way. The only valid arguments for State-mandated marriage in this country died about 50 years ago with the advent of modern medical science - and besides that marriage has little, if anything, to do with having children anymore anyway. I would like to see State marriage dismantled in America, and in the case where rights such as Power of Attorney and Benefactors are concerned people should be free to specify those as they please if you ask me. Who's allowed to come see me in the hospital when I'm sick? Whoever I say so or put in writing beforehand, that's who.

America is in love with and has some twisted fascination with Victorian style weddings which used to be a thing that ONLY royalty had. Some folks call that "The Princess Complex", but I see it more as a delusion of grandeur. If you want your church involved, fine; if you want your family involved, fine. But the government and my tax dollars really have no place being involved in the petty squabbles of two people who had some dream of sharing a life together that fell apart because they predictably mismanaged their personal affairs between each other. Fuck. That. Noise.

Rational enough for ya? Tosses the whole premise of gay marriage right out the goddamned window, because marriage is a personal contract between two people for which it is up to them to carry out.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9 101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 29th, 2025 07:05 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios