"A constitutional amendment...."

[radmoose]

"A constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriages is a form of gay bashing and it would do noting at all to protect traditional marriage" - Corretta Scott King

Anyone have an opposing viewpoint that can be articulated with rational thought?

Comments

[jurann.livejournal.com]

I respectfully disagree. It was a mistake to get involved, and it would be a mistake to not get out of it. Same as the Iraq war. Small government is better for society, getting between men and women (or men and men or women and women or person and animal for that matter) is not the purpose nor domain of government. If anything at all, that should be a community issue. I truly believe government has no place in the private lives of couples, nor should it write laws preventing larger groups/bigamy/etc.

[radmoose.livejournal.com]

Um, I was kinda being sarcastic in that last statement.

It is one of those things that once they have their foot in it, they don't see the advantage of getting out of it.

I probably should have written it as "..and they feel it is in their best interest to keep it going."

For example, we are still paying "excise tax" on bicycle tires and tubes that was supposed to be abolished a long time ago... it is hidden at the distributor level, but it still exists, as it is seen as bringing in money, and those on the inside want to keep it that way... and yes, we are being taxed (sales tax) on a tax (excise tax.)

My point is that in many things Government have gotten so involved that they can't bring themselves together to get out of it.